In my current practice-led research, I am developing a method of ‘visiting’ objects through exploring everyday use as an encounter.
I borrow the term â€˜visitingâ€™ from Donna Harawayâ€™s description of Vinciane Despretâ€™s approach in her ethological work, in which she looks at how we can ask questions in a way that allows us to think-with other humans and animals. Applying this to our relation with everyday objects, and reading this attunement through the lens of the Heideggerian encounter, opens up a process of noticing our daily gestures of use as capable of producing expanded ontological and epistemological possibilities. This involves unpicking the implied hierarchy in daily use of objects, in which one thing/body is purposed to serve another, and a stepping sideways from what Ahmed terms “instrumental rationality”. This also readdesses the notion of use-value, in the Marxist sense, as based on the fulfilment of human need.
This is not solely an intellectual exercise, but a daily practice created through our everyday actions within our shared spaces. I propose that it is through the daily acts of use that we can reform, permeably, our habitual ways of being, and with that, the directions of our thinking and approach to discover and build more attuned and respectful and compassionate ways of relating those around us; from object to plant, animal to human.
It is through our ability to embrace the encounter, that we can intra-actively invent what one another can be/become and create space for emergent knowledge intra-dependently co-thought and put into action. A multidimensional visiting practice that becomes an opening of wormholes through lived histories, possible presents and emerging, unpredictable futures.